PACIFIC CONTINENTAL CORP
Financials · National Commercial Banks · OR · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY16 | FY15 | FY14 | FY13 | FY12 | FY11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | $5.5M | $2.8M | $16.0M | $13.8M | $12.7M | $5.3M |
| Total assets | $2.54B | $1.91B | $1.50B | $1.45B | $1.37B | $1.27B |
| Total liabilities | $2.27B | $1.69B | $1.32B | $1.27B | $1.19B | $1.09B |
| Equity | $273.8M | $218.5M | $184.2M | $179.2M | $183.4M | $178.9M |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.28 | $0.15 | $0.89 | $0.76 | $0.69 | $0.29 |
| Shares out. | 19.6M | 17.7M | 17.9M | 17.8M | 18.4M | 18.4M |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2016- Operating margin
- —
- Net margin
- —
- Return on equity
- 2.0%
- Return on assets
- 0.2%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- —
- Liabilities / assets
- 89.2%
- Debt / equity
- 8.28×
- Book value / share
- $13.96
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- —
- Net income growth (YoY)
- 94.8%
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2016- Accruals / assets
- −1.0%clean
- Piotroski F-Score
- 4/6mixed
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast. What these scores mean →
Signs
● 1 warning● 2 good- High leverage (liabilities > 70% of assets)
- Positive operating cash flow
- Clean earnings (low accruals)
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Completed an acquisition or disposition · Other material eventNov 1, 2017
- Other material eventOct 16, 2017
- Other material eventJul 17, 2017
- Shareholder vote · Other material eventJun 8, 2017
- Results of operations · Other material eventApr 27, 2017
- Results of operations · Other material eventJan 26, 2017
- Entered a material agreement · Regulation FD disclosure · Other material eventJan 10, 2017
- Results of operationsOct 26, 2016
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.
Recent SEC filings
All filings ↗- 15-12GNov 13, 2017
- EFFECTNov 9, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 2, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 2, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 2, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 2, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 2, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
- 4PRIMARY DOCUMENTNov 1, 2017
Event-driven situations (1)
Spot an error in this record? Report it. Every correction is verified against the source filing before we change anything.