HITOR GROUP, INC.
Industrials · Engines & Turbines · NV · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY13 | FY12 | FY11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | $31,723 | — |
| Operating income | — | — | — |
| Net income | −$3.0M | −$699,576 | −$271,140 |
| Total assets | $14,529 | $145,709 | $186,885 |
| Total liabilities | $1.1M | $1.0M | $805,983 |
| Equity | −$1.1M | −$860,925 | −$619,098 |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.01 | $0.00 |
| Shares out. | — | 69.2M | — |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2013- Operating margin
- —
- Net margin
- —
- Return on equity
- 283.4%
- Return on assets
- −20596.6%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- —
- Liabilities / assets
- 7367.2%
- Debt / equity
- —
- Book value / share
- —
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- —
- Net income growth (YoY)
- —
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2013- Accruals / assets
- −7587.2%clean
- Piotroski F-Score
- 1/6weak
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Signs
● 2 severe● 2 warning● 2 good- Negative shareholder equity
- Filed a late-filing notice (Form NT) — missed an SEC deadline
- High leverage (liabilities > 70% of assets)
- Negative operating cash flow
- Strong return on equity (>15%)
- Clean earnings (low accruals)
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Risk flags
late SEC filings- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Apr 1, 2015
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Aug 15, 2014
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗May 15, 2014
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Apr 1, 2014
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Nov 15, 2013
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗May 15, 2013
A Form NT means the company notified the SEC it would file a periodic report late — often an accounting, audit or liquidity warning sign. Also search SEC enforcement actions for this company.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Changed auditor · Prior financials not reliable (restatement)Jun 26, 2015
- Prior financials not reliable (restatement)Mar 1, 2013
- Director / officer changeAug 14, 2012
- Prior financials not reliable (restatement)Oct 21, 2011
- Prior financials not reliable (restatement)Apr 10, 2009
- Changed auditorNov 14, 2006
- Director / officer changeNov 9, 2006
- Amended charter or bylawsNov 3, 2006
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.
Recent SEC filings
All filings ↗- REVOKEDDec 22, 2016
- 8-KJun 26, 2015
- RWWITHDRAWAL OF 14CApr 10, 2015
- NT 10-KApr 1, 2015
- SC 13GSCHEDULE 13GApr 1, 2015
- SC 13GSCHEDULE 13GApr 1, 2015
- PRE 14CMar 4, 2015
- 10-Q10QNov 14, 2014
- 10-QAug 19, 2014
- NT 10-QAug 15, 2014
- 10-K/AFORM 10-K AMENDMENT NO 1May 21, 2014
- 10-Q10QMay 20, 2014
- NT 10-QMay 15, 2014
- 10-KApr 15, 2014
- NT 10-KApr 1, 2014