Event-Driven Stocks

Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Healthcare · Pharmaceutical Preparations · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕

Signs4 good2 warningdetails ↓

Financials

SEC XBRL · annual
 FY16FY15FY14FY13FY12FY11
Revenue$47.2M$29.5M$115.5M$89.6M$81.5M$54.8M
Operating income−$503,000$9.7M$27.2M$9.2M$8.3M−$17.7M
Net income−$4.1M$6.4M$13.1M$7.0M$5.1M−$17.3M
Total assets$520.9M$457.2M$141.6M$136.9M$127.8M$157.6M
Total liabilities$353.8M$370.7M$59.3M$77.9M$84.8M$119.0M
Equity$167.1M$86.4M$82.3M$59.0M$43.3M$38.6M
EPS (diluted)$-0.10$0.14$0.29$0.16$0.12$-0.41
Shares out.45.5M44.9M44.0M42.0M41.8M41.8M

Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.

Key ratios

from filings · FY2016
Operating margin
−1.1%
Net margin
−8.6%
Return on equity
−2.4%
Return on assets
−0.8%
Return on capital (ROCE)
−0.1%
Liabilities / assets
67.9%
Debt / equity
2.12×
Book value / share
$3.67
Revenue growth (YoY)
60.1%
Net income growth (YoY)
−163.3%

Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.

Financial health

forensic scores · FY2016
Altman Z″ (distress)
4.19safe
Accruals / assets
2.4%clean
Piotroski F-Score
5/9mixed

Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.

Quality score

EDS Score
52
/ 100
Profitability 0Growth 50Catalyst 33Earnings quality 100Financial strength 75

Our own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.

Signs

2 warning4 good
  • Operating losses (negative operating margin)
  • Reported a net loss
  • Revenue is growing year-over-year
  • Positive operating cash flow
  • Clean earnings (low accruals)
  • Altman Z″ in the safe zone

Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.

Material events

SEC Form 8-K · most recent

Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.

Recent SEC filings

All filings ↗

Event-driven situations (1)

Spot an error in this record? Report it. Every correction is verified against the source filing before we change anything.