CYAN INC
Technology · Services-Computer Integrated Systems Design · DE · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY14 | FY13 | FY12 | FY11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $100.5M | $116.6M | $95.9M | $40.4M |
| Operating income | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | −$59.2M | −$40.7M | −$16.6M | −$15.9M |
| Total assets | $115.7M | $121.5M | $70.8M | — |
| Total liabilities | $85.7M | $42.6M | $55.7M | — |
| Equity | $29.9M | $78.9M | −$83.1M | −$68.7M |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — | — | — |
| Shares out. | 46.8M | 46.5M | 2.6M | — |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2014- Operating margin
- —
- Net margin
- −58.9%
- Return on equity
- −197.8%
- Return on assets
- −51.2%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- —
- Liabilities / assets
- 74.1%
- Debt / equity
- 2.86×
- Book value / share
- $0.64
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- −13.8%
- Net income growth (YoY)
- —
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2014- Accruals / assets
- −14.8%clean
- Beneish M-Score
- 1.36elevated
- Piotroski F-Score
- 2/8weak
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Signs
● 5 warning● 1 good- Reported a net loss
- Revenue declined year-over-year
- High leverage (liabilities > 70% of assets)
- Negative operating cash flow
- Beneish M-Score elevated — earnings-manipulation screen flag
- Clean earnings (low accruals)
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Completed an acquisition or disposition · Delisting / listing-standard notice · Modified shareholder rights · Change in control · Director / officer change · Amended charter or bylaws · Shareholder voteAug 3, 2015
- Results of operationsJul 31, 2015
- Other material eventJun 17, 2015
- Other material eventJun 15, 2015
- Other material eventMay 11, 2015
- Entered a material agreement · Other material eventMay 6, 2015
- Results of operations · Other material eventMay 4, 2015
- Results of operationsFeb 18, 2015
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.
Recent SEC filings
All filings ↗- SC 13G/AFeb 16, 2016
- SC 13G/AFeb 2, 2016
- 15-12BFORM 15Aug 13, 2015
- SC 13D/ASCHEDULE 13D AMENDMENT NO. 1Aug 12, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 5, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 5, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 5, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 5, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
- 4FORM 4 SUBMISSIONAug 3, 2015
Event-driven situations (1)
Spot an error in this record? Report it. Every correction is verified against the source filing before we change anything.