Kama Resources Inc.
Financials · Blank Checks · NV · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY14 | FY13 | FY12 | FY11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | −$55,410 | −$15,300 | −$18,465 | −$7,252 |
| Net income | −$55,410 | −$15,300 | −$18,465 | −$7,252 |
| Total assets | $20,005 | $20,005 | $5 | $5 |
| Total liabilities | — | — | — | — |
| Equity | −$32,410 | −$10,765 | −$15,465 | −$7,245 |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — | — | — |
| Shares out. | — | 3.0M | — | — |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2014- Operating margin
- —
- Net margin
- —
- Return on equity
- 171.0%
- Return on assets
- −277.0%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- —
- Liabilities / assets
- —
- Debt / equity
- —
- Book value / share
- —
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- —
- Net income growth (YoY)
- —
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2014- Accruals / assets
- −262.0%clean
- Piotroski F-Score
- 1/5weak
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Signs
● 2 severe● 1 warning● 2 good- Negative shareholder equity
- Filed a late-filing notice (Form NT) — missed an SEC deadline
- Negative operating cash flow
- Strong return on equity (>15%)
- Clean earnings (low accruals)
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Risk flags
late SEC filings- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Jun 15, 2017
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Jan 29, 2016
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Sep 15, 2015
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Jun 16, 2015
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Jan 29, 2015
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Sep 11, 2014
A Form NT means the company notified the SEC it would file a periodic report late — often an accounting, audit or liquidity warning sign. Also search SEC enforcement actions for this company.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Prior financials not reliable (restatement)Aug 15, 2017
- Changed auditorAug 15, 2017
- Changed auditorSep 15, 2015
- Changed auditorFeb 5, 2014
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.