LUXURBAN HOTELS INC.
Real Estate · Real Estate · DE · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY23 | FY22 | FY21 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.4M | $43.8M | $21.4M |
| Operating income | −$30.5M | −$3.5M | −$733,877 |
| Net income | −$78.5M | −$9.4M | −$2.2M |
| Total assets | $283.3M | $108.0M | $3.8M |
| Total liabilities | $286.8M | $111.3M | $15.0M |
| Equity | −$9.3M | −$3.3M | −$11.2M |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.06 | $-0.40 | — |
| Shares out. | 29.4M | 27.7M | 27.7M |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2023- Operating margin
- −26.9%
- Net margin
- −69.2%
- Return on equity
- 846.8%
- Return on assets
- −27.7%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- −12.2%
- Liabilities / assets
- 101.2%
- Debt / equity
- —
- Book value / share
- $-0.32
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- 158.7%
- Net income growth (YoY)
- —
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2023- Altman Z″ (distress)
- -2.22distress
- Accruals / assets
- −21.3%clean
- Piotroski F-Score
- 3/9weak
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Signs
● 3 severe● 4 warning● 3 good- Negative shareholder equity
- Altman Z″ in the distress zone
- Filed a late-filing notice (Form NT) — missed an SEC deadline
- Operating losses (negative operating margin)
- Reported a net loss
- High leverage (liabilities > 70% of assets)
- Negative operating cash flow
- Strong return on equity (>15%)
- Revenue is growing year-over-year
- Clean earnings (low accruals)
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Risk flags
late SEC filings- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Aug 14, 2025
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗May 15, 2025
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Apr 1, 2025
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Nov 14, 2024
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Aug 14, 2024
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Apr 1, 2024
A Form NT means the company notified the SEC it would file a periodic report late — often an accounting, audit or liquidity warning sign. Also search SEC enforcement actions for this company.
5%+ owners
SEC Schedule 13D / 13G · last 3 yrs- Ferdinand BrianActivist (13D)Dec 26, 2024
- Goudy Park Capital, L.P.Passive (13G)Oct 31, 2024
Holders who disclosed a 5%+ stake. 13D signals intent to influence or control; 13G is a passive holding. Latest filing per holder — open it for the exact stake.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Bankruptcy or receivership · Debt acceleration / triggering eventSep 18, 2025
- Director / officer changeJun 30, 2025
- Entered a material agreementJun 12, 2025
- Changed auditorMay 30, 2025
- Director / officer changeMay 5, 2025
- Director / officer changeMay 2, 2025
- Director / officer changeApr 17, 2025
- Entered a material agreement · Regulation FD disclosureApr 7, 2025
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.