CAPITAL REALTY INVESTORS IV LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Real Estate · Operators of Apartment Buildings · MD · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY12 | FY11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | — | — |
| Operating income | — | — |
| Net income | $7.9M | $1.6M |
| Total assets | $10.9M | $10.0M |
| Total liabilities | $9.1M | $8.8M |
| Equity | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
| Shares out. | — | — |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2012- Operating margin
- —
- Net margin
- —
- Return on equity
- —
- Return on assets
- 72.8%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- —
- Liabilities / assets
- 83.5%
- Debt / equity
- —
- Book value / share
- —
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- —
- Net income growth (YoY)
- 408.7%
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2012- Accruals / assets
- 80.8%high accruals
- Piotroski F-Score
- 3/5weak
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast. What these scores mean →
Signs
● 1 severe● 3 warning● 0 good- Filed a late-filing notice (Form NT) — missed an SEC deadline
- High leverage (liabilities > 70% of assets)
- Negative operating cash flow
- High accruals — earnings-quality risk
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Risk flags
late SEC filings- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗May 15, 2013
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Mar 29, 2013
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Aug 15, 2012
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗May 16, 2012
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Mar 30, 2012
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Nov 14, 2011
A Form NT means the company notified the SEC it would file a periodic report late — often an accounting, audit or liquidity warning sign. Also search SEC enforcement actions for this company.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Changed auditorNov 8, 2012
- Changed auditorDec 28, 2010
- Item 1Oct 4, 1996
- Item 1Sep 17, 1996
- Item 1Feb 26, 1996
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.
Recent SEC filings
All filings ↗- 15-12GDec 31, 2013
- 10-QNov 14, 2013
- 10-QAug 14, 2013
- 10-QJun 3, 2013
- NT 10-QMay 15, 2013
- 10-KApr 30, 2013
- NT 10-KMar 29, 2013
- 10-QQUARTERLY REPORTNov 9, 2012
- 8-KFORM 8KNov 8, 2012
- 10-QQUARTERLY REPORTSep 27, 2012
- 10-QQUARTERLY REPORTSep 26, 2012
- NT 10-QNOTIFICATION OF LATE FILINGAug 15, 2012
- 10-KANNUAL REPORTAug 10, 2012
- NT 10-QNOTIFICATION OF LATE FILINGMay 16, 2012
- NT 10-KNOTIFICATION OF LATE FILINGMar 30, 2012
Event-driven situations (1)
Spot an error in this record? Report it. Every correction is verified against the source filing before we change anything.