SEAL123 INC
Consumer Discretionary · Retail-Women's Clothing Stores · DE · SEC filings ↗ · Compare ⊕
Financials
SEC XBRL · annual| FY14 | FY13 | FY12 | FY11 | FY10 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $530.1M | $580.4M | $620.1M | $581.2M | $560.9M |
| Operating income | −$37.9M | −$70.3M | $25.0M | $25.2M | $22.9M |
| Net income | −$38.4M | −$113.2M | $15.1M | $12.6M | $86.9M |
| Total assets | $151.7M | $226.5M | $330.5M | $368.5M | — |
| Total liabilities | $84.4M | $97.8M | $89.5M | $92.8M | — |
| Equity | $67.3M | $128.7M | $241.1M | $275.7M | $260.1M |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-1.28 | $0.16 | $0.12 | $0.85 |
| Shares out. | 85.5M | 88.7M | 92.8M | 99.4M | 96.3M |
Reported figures from the company's SEC filings (XBRL). Blank where a line item isn't cleanly tagged — never estimated.
Key ratios
from filings · FY2014- Operating margin
- −7.2%
- Net margin
- −7.2%
- Return on equity
- −57.0%
- Return on assets
- −25.3%
- Return on capital (ROCE)
- −37.9%
- Liabilities / assets
- 55.6%
- Debt / equity
- 1.25×
- Book value / share
- $0.79
- Revenue growth (YoY)
- −8.7%
- Net income growth (YoY)
- —
Computed from the company's own SEC figures — no market price, so these are facts, not a valuation. Book value per share is reported equity ÷ shares; it is not the stock price.
Financial health
forensic scores · FY2014- Altman Z″ (distress)
- -2.42distress
- Accruals / assets
- −13.7%clean
- Piotroski F-Score
- 5/9mixed
Altman Z″is a textbook bankruptcy-distress score from book values only (>2.6 safe · 1.1–2.6 grey · <1.1 distress). Accruals = (net income − operating cash flow) ÷ assets; persistently high accruals are an earnings-quality red flag. Beneish M-Scoreis an eight-ratio screen comparing this year with last (M > −1.78 = elevated manipulation-risk screen, not proof). Piotroski F-Scorecounts how many of nine fundamental-health checks pass (shown as passed / applicable; we use operating margin and total liabilities as documented proxies where the exact input isn't XBRL-tagged). Computed from SEC filings — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Quality score
EDS ScoreOur own multi-factor score from free SEC data — profitability, growth, financial strength, earnings quality, and event/ownership catalysts. No market price and no licensed model: each axis is the share of source-backed checks it passes. Descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Signs
● 2 severe● 4 warning● 1 good- Altman Z″ in the distress zone
- Filed a late-filing notice (Form NT) — missed an SEC deadline
- Operating losses (negative operating margin)
- Reported a net loss
- Revenue declined year-over-year
- Negative operating cash flow
- Clean earnings (low accruals)
Derived from the company's own SEC figures (fundamentals, forensic scores, filing discipline) — descriptive factors, not advice or a forecast.
Risk flags
late SEC filings- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Apr 16, 2015
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Dec 8, 2006
- NT 10-Qmissed a reporting deadline ↗Jun 9, 2005
- NT 10-Kmissed a reporting deadline ↗Apr 15, 2005
A Form NT means the company notified the SEC it would file a periodic report late — often an accounting, audit or liquidity warning sign. Also search SEC enforcement actions for this company.
Material events
SEC Form 8-K · most recent- Bankruptcy or receivershipDec 31, 2015
- Other material eventDec 9, 2015
- Other material eventNov 19, 2015
- Bankruptcy or receivershipNov 4, 2015
- Other material eventOct 13, 2015
- Other material eventSep 15, 2015
- Other material eventAug 14, 2015
- Other material eventJul 29, 2015
Events the company reported on Form 8-K, labelled by the SEC item code it filed under — its own classification, not our interpretation.
Recent SEC filings
All filings ↗- SC 13G/ASEAL123 INC SC13GAFeb 8, 2016
- EFFECTJan 11, 2016
- 15-12BDec 31, 2015
- 8-KDec 31, 2015
- S-8 POSDec 23, 2015
- S-8 POSDec 23, 2015
- S-8 POSDec 23, 2015
- S-8 POSDec 23, 2015
- POS AMDec 23, 2015
- 8-KFORM 8-KDec 9, 2015
- 8-KNov 19, 2015
- 8-KNov 4, 2015
- 8-KFORM 8-KOct 13, 2015
- 8-KSep 15, 2015
- 8-KFORM 8-KAug 14, 2015
Event-driven situations (1)
Spot an error in this record? Report it. Every correction is verified against the source filing before we change anything.