Spin-offSpun off from FAT BrandsFATAQOTC
The two companies
Open either company's hub for its full SEC financials, ratios, ownership, filings, and every other event it's been part of.
- Sector
- Consumer Discretionary
- Industry
- Retail-Eating Places
- Exchange
- OTC
- State of incorporation
- DE
- Record date
- January 27, 2025
- Distribution date
- January 29, 2025
- Ratio
- —
- Parent sector
- Retail-Eating Places
- Form
- 10-12B/A
- Filed
- January 10, 2025
Financials — parent vs spin-off
SEC XBRL · latest year- Revenue
- $593M
- Operating income
- −$52M
- Net income
- −$190M
- Total assets
- $1.29B
- Equity
- −$456M
- Revenue
- $354M
- Operating income
- −$8M
- Net income
- −$48M
- Total assets
- $542M
- Equity
- −$85M
Latest reported figures from each company's own SEC filings — the parent after the separation and the spin-off as a standalone. Full multi-year history on each company hub.
Spin-off signals
score 1/8 favorable · factors, not advice- Focus-increasingNo — both Consumer Discretionary
Spin-offs into a different sector than the parent (pure-plays) have historically outperformed diversifying ones.
- Size vs parent (revenue)~60% of parent
Smaller spin-offs draw more forced selling from holders who can't keep them — the classic mispricing edge.
- Leverage (liabilities/assets)116%
A heavy debt load loaded onto the spin-off is a known risk; a clean balance sheet is favorable.
- Return on capital employed-1.7%
EBIT ÷ capital employed — the quality metric the spin-off scorecard research weighs most.
- Operating margin-2.4%
Profitability of the standalone business, from its own SEC filings.
- Tax-basis reportNone found
A Form 8937 (basis allocation) accompanies tax-free §355 spin-offs — favorable for taxable holders.
- Insider buying (post-spin)None recorded
Officers/directors buying their own newly independent shares (Form 4) has historically preceded outperformance.
- Time since spin-off1.3 years
Studies find the spin-off return premium concentrates in roughly the first one to three years.
Factors the spin-off research literature (Greenblatt; Cusatis-Miles-Woolridge; Desai-Jain) associates with outcomes — computed from this company's own SEC filings, shown as factors, not a recommendation. The premium is debated and not guaranteed. How we compute these ↗
Filings & documents
Every entry traces to SEC EDGAR. The Information Statement is the primary source; the links below open the full filing and each company's complete filing history.